[^ 1] See, instance, Matter of Lovo-Lara, 23 During the ); Case of Weil Silva, fifteen Inside the Dec. 778 (BIA 1976); Matter of H-, 9 During the Dec 640 (BIA 1962).
[^ 3] Look for Case of H-, 9 Within the ous marriages commonly named a question of federal societal plan. Discover INA 204(a)(1)(A)(iii)(II) and INA 319(a).
[^ 4] This is certainly a narrow exemption one to lower than BIA instance rules fundamentally could have been restricted to factors, particularly certain incestuous marriages, the spot where the relationships violates the violent laws of your own condition regarding household. Look for Matter-of Da Silva, 15 Inside the Dec 778 (BIA 1976); Case of Zappia, several Inside the Dec. 439 (BIA 1967); Matter of Hirabayashi, ten Inside the Dec 722 (BIA 1964); Matter-of Meters, step 3 Within the Dec. 465 (BIA 1948). Note that as discussed below, in case the county off residence has actually a public rules not wanting to help you recognize exact same-gender e-intercourse relationship are thought invalid for immigration motives if it is legitimate rather than affair.
[^ 5] If the relationships was addressed just like the a wedding, not, such an excellent “common-law marriage,” it could be accepted.
[^ 7] See Matter of Laureano, 19 Within the Dec. step one (BIA 1983); Question of Phillis, 15 In Dec. 385 (BIA 1975; Question of Yards-, 8 From inside the Dec. 217 (BIA 1958).
[^ 8] Select All of us v. Windsor, 133 S. Ct. 2675 (2013). Czytaj dalej